Friday, March 20, 2015

Steve Korch : Why I don't actually look beyond myself





In in 2002 and then in 2005, I was finally confronted about molesting a girl in 1975, by the very victim herself.  Since that time, I have blamed others, including Randy Chapel and Carol Nye-Wilson for this.  Looking back, in fact, it was she in 2002 that confronted me via email and then it was she in 2005 sitting in the deposition confronting me.

Since that time, she has also confronted me - labeling me a Bastard, making out a statement concerning what happen, and even going to the church I was ordinated at.

Randy Chapel and Carol Nye-Wilson never wrote these things, or caused my victim to do these things..... but the reality of this, this is not something I can accept.



All my religious friends gathered around me and covered for me.

Well today, musing with my standard insightful religious rhetoric I stated, "It means that I must repeatedly give up the desperate attempt to be the hero of my own story and willingly give that role to the one who is my Redeemer God. I must choose to place full confidence in Him as my only true hope."

After being confronted about molesting a child in 1975 and the ongoing cover up that took place, I proceeded to threaten everyone that had knowledge of the events, who would not cover for me.  In short, I took over to be my own hero and used others to spar with anyone with knowledge of who I really am.  In so doing I destroyed many lives.


You see, I might claim God, but in reality, I am my own God... I am my own redeemer.  I rejected who I publicly call "my Redeemer God" and proceeded to redeem myself using lies and misrepresentations, and threats from an array of attorneys.   I did this because I am actually a narcissistic.

In fact, I actually like to re-write the story time and time again because evangelicals who follow me are not bright and refuse to consider what was actually going on.

So for many years, I stated:  



The current fabrication story is (March 20, 2015)

What I don't want people to know is:

• I was actually confronted in 2002 by my victim and she made this public.

• I was actually confronted in person by my victim in 2005 at my deposition on June 24, 2005.  The victim herself walks in front the camera and she made this public.

• I was actually confronted by letter to me and others on Jan 19, 2006 which stated in part:

"All parties involved should be advised that the current congregation of Faith Baptist Church has been made aware of this moral failure that took place in 1975. They should also be aware that the leadership of Faith Baptist has expressed its opinion to Steve that, given the public nature of this sin, for the sake of the name of Christ, the more honorable course of action may be for him to voluntarily step down from his position of public ministry. " -- of course, I disregarded Bard Marshall and the church and continue speaking, while threatening Randy Chapel and Carol Nye-Wilson.

While I claim I have been restored, 30 plus years later, the very church I was ordained did not buy it and asked that I step down.  Had I actually been restored and transformed, this never would had been an issue.  This 2006 letter itself is titled "An open letter to..."

• I was actually confronted by my victim in May 2006 again at Saratoga Federated Church with my wife and pastor Russ Ikeda. I actually had to be prodded by Ikeda to say I was sorry.  This could never be a private meeting covered by the Clergy-Penitent Privilege and this has also been made public.

In fact, I attempted to cover up a meeting at a camp in which I spoke at, claiming "the Clergy-Penitent Privilege" among other things in an all out bid to cover up what was said and going on.  The court force me, my attorneys and others at Western Seminary to pay $1925 for such a malformed argument that had no basis in law.




With the involvement of Bert Downs, Randal Roberts, Rob Wiggins, Gary Tuck and Lynn Ruark, and attorneys Ellen Hung, Andrew Adler, and Linda McPharlin, with Superior Court Judge Leonard Sprinkles  I actually attempted to cover all of this up.  

I don't want anyone to know the truth, don't want anyone to question my story, and I don't want anyone to question my "Redemption Story" I spin to everyone.

Most of all, I don't want anyone to know the law about Child Molestation in the state and that by using my mouth, fingers and penis on my victim, had she testified, my life would had been different.  

Because others covered for me and because I screwed her up so emotionally, her parents would not allow her to testify, given the further damage it would put her through.

• Acts Motivated by Unnatural or Abnormal Sexual Interest.People v. Maurer (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1121, 1126-1227 [38 Cal.Rptr.2d 335]; In re Gladys R. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 855, 867 [83 Cal.Rptr. 671, 464 P.2d 127]. 
• Annoy and Molest Defined; Objective Standard. People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 289-290 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 195, 9656 P.2d 713]; People v. Kongs (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1741, 1749-1750 [37 Cal.Rptr.2d 327]; People v. Pallares (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d Supp. 895, 901-902 [246 P.2d 173]. 
• Lewd Act Not Required. People v. Thompson (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 459, 465-466 [253 Cal.Rptr. 564]. 
• Minor's Consent Not a Defense. People v. Cardenas (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 927, 937, fn. 7 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 567] [dicta, in context of lewd act]. 
• Minor Need Not Actually Be Annoyed. People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 290 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 195, 965 P.2d 713]. 
• Actual Touching Not Required. People v. Memro (1995) 11 Cal.4th 786, 781 [47 Cal.Rptr.2d 219, 905 P.2d 1305]; People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 289 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 195, 965 P.2d 713].

Commentary 
"Annoy" and "molest" are synonymous and generally refer to conduct designed to disturb, irritate, offend, injure, or at least tend to injure, another person. (People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 289 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 195, 965 P.2d 713]; People v. Carskaddon (1957) 49 Cal.2d 423, 426 [318 P.2d 4].) "Annoy means to disturb or irritate, especially by continued or repeated acts . . . . [�] '[M]olest' [means] . . . 'to interfere with or meddle with unwarrantably so as to injure or disturb.' " (People v. Pallares (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d Supp. 895, 901 [246 P.2d 173].) A photographer can "annoy" a minor by taking the minor's photograph in a public place in an offensive and irritating manner. (See Ecker v. Raging Waters Group, Inc. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1320, 1325 [105 Cal.Rptr.2d 320].) A lewd act is not required. (People v. Thompson (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 459, 465-466 [253 Cal.Rptr. 564].)


My story is not about redemption or about God. My story is about using my Christian friends, employer Western Seminary and attorneys to threaten people, lying and cheating to get my way.  

I am my own redeemer; I am my own god. 

I don't need Hope.... I just need people to cover my ass.


People are completely foolish to believe in anything else about me.

P.S. If Randy Chapel or Carol Nye-Wilson say anything, provide any documents which contradict my various incantations of god's grace or informs the actual events, I can actually make money on the deal